ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
Association between cancer screenings uptake and genetic testing for cancer risk among US adults: findings from HINTS 2017-2020.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suboptimal Adherence to Hereditary Cancer Risk Management Guidelines: A Cohort Study of High-Risk Individuals in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Survivors' Responses to an Online Intervention to Promote Discussions of Cancer Genetic Risk with Blood Relatives.Public health genomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic testing for cancer risk is a vital tool for preventive care, yet its association with the uptake of evidence-based cancer screening remains unclear. This study examined the association between cancer-risk genetic testing and cancer screening uptake using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (2017 and 2020), a nationally representative sample of US adults. We focused on the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended screening tests for colorectal (CRC), breast, and cervical cancers. Multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors, were used to assess the relationship between cancer screening uptake and cancer-risk genetic testing. The analysis included 6,629 respondents (mean age 48.5 years; 50.7% female; 61.1% non-Hispanic White). Of the respondents, 3.3% had undergone genetic testing for cancer risk. Among eligible populations, screening uptake was 85.2% for Pap tests, 80.8% for mammograms, and 81.3% for CRC. Unadjusted analysis showed a significant association between breast cancer screening and genetic testing (p = 0.005), which lost significance after covariate adjustment. Most respondents who underwent genetic testing received result interpretation assistance from healthcare providers and genetic counselors. Among those who received genetic testing, all respondents who received assistance from genetic counselors were adherent to cancer screening recommendations. Our results suggest that while genetic testing was associated with breast cancer screening in unadjusted analyses, this association was not maintained after adjusting for covariates. No significant associations were found between genetic testing and cervical cancer or CRC screening. Further research using prospective designs is needed to examine the effectiveness of genetic testing in enhancing cancer prevention and screening efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.