Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304941›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

A Current Review of Generative AI in Medicine: Core Concepts, Applications, and Current Limitations.

Pouria Rouzrokh, Bardia Khosravi, Shahriar Faghani, Mana Moassefi, M Moein Shariatnia, Parsa Rouzrokh, Bradley Erickson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating multi-omics data for next-generation cancer research and precision medicine.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pouria RouzrokhMayo Clinic AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. rouzrokh.pouria@mayo.edu.
Bardia KhosraviMayo Clinic AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Shahriar FaghaniMayo Clinic AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mana MoassefiMayo Clinic AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M Moein ShariatniaTehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parsa RouzrokhMayo Clinic AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bradley EricksonMayo Clinic AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims to offer a foundational overview of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) for healthcare professionals without an engineering background. It seeks to aid their understanding of Generative AI's current capabilities, applications, and limitations within the medical field. RECENT

findingsGenerative AI models, distinct from discriminative models, are designed to create novel synthetic data. Key model families discussed include diffusion models for generating images and videos, Large Language Models (LLMs) for text, and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) capable of processing multiple data types. Recent applications in healthcare are diverse, encompassing general uses like generating synthetic medical images, automating clinical documentation, and creating synthetic audio/video for training. More specialized applications include leveraging Generative AI models as backbones for diagnostic aids, enhancing information retrieval through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, and coordinating multiple AI agents in complex workflows. Generative AI holds significant transformative potential in medicine, enhancing capabilities across imaging, documentation, education, and decision support. However, its integration faces substantial challenges, including models' knowledge limitations, the risk of generating incorrect or uncertain "hallucinated" outputs, inherent biases from training data, difficulty in interpreting model reasoning ("black box" nature), and navigating complex regulatory and ethical issues. This review offers a balanced perspective, acknowledging both the promise and the hurdles. While Generative AI is unlikely to fully replace physicians, understanding and leveraging these technologies will be crucial for medical professionals navigating the evolving healthcare landscape.

Identifiers

PMID40304941
PMCPMC12185825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.