Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304925›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025

Professionals' and Families' Perspectives on Essential Elements of Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis on Families with Multiple and Enduring Problems in Integrated Youth Care.

Anne Marie Barnhoorn-Bos, Eva A Mulder, Laura A Nooteboom, E H Alet Meurs, Robert R J M Vermeiren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Marie Barnhoorn-BosDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LUMC Curium, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, Leiden, 2300 AA, The Netherlands. m.a.barnhoorn@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4203-6012
Eva A MulderResearch Institute Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, Amsterdam, 1018 WS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5906-5867
Laura A NooteboomDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LUMC Curium, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, Leiden, 2300 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-4863
E H Alet MeursGGZ Rivierduinen Children and Youth, Institute for Mental Health, Postbox 405, Leiden, 2300 AK, The Netherlands.
Robert R J M VermeirenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LUMC Curium, Leiden University Medical Center, Post Box 15, Leiden, 2300 AA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-2207

Funding

ZonMw 744220101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM), known to improve client engagement in care and its quality, is crucial to achieve family-tailored care. However, when providing integrated youth care, SDM can be challenged by the complexity of families' problems and the multiple family members and professionals involved. Commonly used SDM models may not adequately address these specific challenges. Therefore, this qualitative study explores families' and professionals' perspectives on essential elements of SDM with families experiencing multiple and enduring problems on different life domains (e.g., mental health, parenting, financial, and social problems). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 parents, 3 youth, and 22 professionals from Specialist Integrated care Teams in four regions of the Netherlands. A framework method - comprising essential elements of SDM - was applied to systematically code the transcripts both deductively and inductively. Our study shows the nine essential elements of SDM require a specific interpretation in the context of integrated youth care, regarding the diversity of participants in decision-making, the complexity of the problems, and SDM as a continuous process of multiple decisions. In addition, families and professionals mentioned three complementary elements: (1) build collaborative relationships, (2) prioritize problems, goals and actions, and (3) interprofessional consultation. Thus, in integrated youth care professionals are recommended to consider SDM as a cyclical process of larger and smaller decisions and take time to build collaborative relationships with families and the care network. Throughout the care process families and professionals balance their mutual roles in decision-making in line with the changing needs and preferences of families.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision Making, SharedDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFamilyAdolescentAdultChildCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsParentsProfessional-Family RelationsChild and adolescent mental healthComplex problemsFamiliesIntegrated careShared Decision-Making

Identifiers

PMID40304925
PMCPMC12310899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.