Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304889›Full record

ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2025

The translational journey of cancer nanomedicines: biological and entrepreneurial lessons learned.

Cristianne Johanna Ferdinand Rijcken

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cristianne Johanna Ferdinand RijckenCristal Therapeutics, Oxfordlaan 55, Maastricht, 6229EV, The Netherlands. cristianne.rijcken@cristaltherapeutics.com.ORCID 0009-0006-8490-1376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite exhaustive investments, the breakthrough potential of nanomedicines (NM) is not yet realized. Whilst Doxil and covid-19 vaccines demonstrated certain benefits, many NM failed in clinical development. Lies the true reason for this limited success in inappropriate assumptions, incorrect approaches, or other omissions? This note describes the translational journey of CPC634 (docetaxel entrapping core-crosslinked polymeric micelles) and illustrates lessons learned in drug product development. Scientific elements are to understand the pathophysiology of the diseased tissue, the journey of NM upon administration and resulting drug release and the induced pharmacodynamic effects over time, particularly in actual patients. Industrial elements comprise market-product fit, target product profile, competitive benchmarking, while development efficiency focuses to generate a positive business case. A goal-oriented product design which is validated by external experts increases chances of development success and assures investor-readiness. NM development will progress by aligning fundamental biological insights with industrial product requirements, driving therapeutic breakthroughs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelNanomedicineNeoplasmsTranslational Research, BiomedicalDrug DevelopmentDrug LiberationHumansMicellesAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelMicellesCancer nanomedicinesClinical evaluationEntrepreneurial aspects spinoffFundamental biological insightsTranslational development

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.