Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304873›Full record

ArticleResearch on child and adolescent psychopathology2025

Primum non nocere: Toward a Greater Understanding of the Potential for Harm in Psychological Treatments for Youth.

Samuel D Spencer, Dean McKay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Samuel D SpencerDepartment of Psychology, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311280, Denton, TX, USA. samuel.spencer@unt.edu.
Dean McKayDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of clinical psychological science has made considerable progress over the years in developing, testing, and disseminating psychological interventions for youth mental health conditions. Despite these achievements, the question of whether certain treatments may actually be inert, or at worst, iatrogenic, has been relatively underexamined compared to affirmative questions of efficacy. Fortunately, interest in the topic of harm within psychological treatments is growing. However, much of this work has taken place from a general theoretical perspective and has primarily focused on adults, and adaptations to youth populations remain limited. Thus, this special issue fills an important gap in the literature in terms of furthering our understanding of the potential for harm in youth mental health treatment. The articles in this collection contain a balance of conceptual, methodological, and empirical research focused on better understanding the potential for harm in youth mental health treatment with regard to particular populations, settings, and psychological disorders. In this introductory article, we: (a) explicate a brief background review of previous conceptual and empirical knowledge development efforts concerning potential for harm in psychological treatments, (b) outline unique considerations for specifically addressing this topic in youth, and (c) provide an overview and synthesis of articles in the collection. This special issue raises awareness of the ways in which youth may inadvertently be adversely affected by psychological interventions. We hope this will lead to greater refinement of beneficial evidence-based interventions and more nuanced attention given to potential areas of pitfall in clinical practice with youth.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychotherapyAdolescentChildHumansAdverse effectsEmpirically supported treatmentsHarmful treatmentsPsychological treatmentPsychotherapyYouth

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.