Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304833›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2025

Economic evaluation on dental caries preventive interventions for Australian children using a priority-setting approach.

Tan Minh Nguyen, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Hanny Calache, Cathrine Mihalopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tan Minh NguyenHealth Economics Group, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, VIC, 3004, Melbourne, Australia. tan.nguyen@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9986-7629
Long Khanh-Dao LeHealth Economics Group, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, VIC, 3004, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-6824
Hanny CalacheDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, VIC, 3125, Burwood, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1613-0585
Cathrine MihalopoulosHealth Economics Group, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 4, 553 St Kilda Road, VIC, 3004, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7127-9462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to economically evaluate three preventive interventions for dental caries among Australian children from low household income. The interventions included: (1) anticipatory guidance provided by oral health therapists via 1a) home visits or 1b) telehealth consultations; (2) school-based dental screening and fluoride varnish program delivered by 2a) dental practitioners or 2b) non-dental health professionals (no screening); and (3) school-based fissure sealant program. The base-case scenario included intervention and dental treatment costs, with six-year (1a and 1b) and two-year (2a, 2b and 3) time horizons. Sensitivity analysis included other healthcare costs (e.g. pulp therapy, extractions, etc.). Additionally, extrapolation modelling extended the 12-year time horizon (all interventions). Probability for cost-effectiveness applied AUD$50,000 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, and AUD$28,033 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained willingness-to-pay thresholds. Under the base-case scenario, none of the interventions were cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness results were sensitive when including other healthcare costs and the 12-year time horizon. Probability for cost-effectiveness (DALYs averted/QALYs gained) with extrapolation modelling in order of ranking were: (1) 91.5%/94.7% for fluoride varnish, (2) 43.9%/48.6% for dental screening and fluoride varnish, (3) 28.7%/29.8% for anticipatory guidance via telehealth, (4) 17.1%/20.0% for fissure sealant, and (5) 2.2%/2.2% for anticipatory guidance via home visits.

Indexed as

Dental CariesHealth PrioritiesAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFluorides, TopicalHumansMalePit and Fissure SealantsPovertyQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTelemedicineFluorides, TopicalPit and Fissure SealantsChildrenDental cariesEconomic evaluationFluoridesResource allocation

Identifiers

PMID40304833
PMCPMC12618282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.