ArticleOecologia2025
Ant foraging: optimizing self-organization as a solution to a traveling salesman problem.
Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foraging ant colonies often face the challenge that food items can appear unpredictably across their territory. This is analogous to traveling salesman/salesperson problems (TSP), wherein solutions to visiting multiple possibly-rewarding sites can vary in cost, travel distance, or site revisits. However, TSP solutions for ants are likely also constrained by cognitive limitations. Rather than envisioning entire routes, ants probably determine their paths by individual-level responses to immediate stimuli, such as nestmate presence or avoiding revisiting an already explored site. Thus, complex group-level search and food retrieval patterns may self-organize from simple individual-level movement rules. Here we derive solutions through simulations that optimize net foraging gains across groups of ant-like agents. Agent search strategies evolve in three spatial networks that differ in travel distances to nests, connectivity, and modularity. We compare patterns from simulations to observed foraging of Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) in identical spatial networks. The simulations and ant experiments find foraging patterns are sensitive to both network characteristics and predictability of food appearance. Simulations are consistent in multiple ways with observed ant behavior, particularly in how network arrangements affect search effort, food encounters, and forager distributions (e.g., clustering in the more connected cells). In some distributions, however, ants find food more successfully than simulations predict. This may reflect a greater premium on encountering food in ants versus increasing find exploitation rates for agents. Overall, the results are encouraging that evolutionary optimization models incorporating relevant ant biology can successfully predict expression of complex group-level behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40304800What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.