ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2025
A mini review on revolutionizing hydrogenation catalysis: unleashing transformative power of artificial intelligence.
Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Catalyst screening for electrochemical ammonia synthesis: a critical review.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThe field of hydrogenation catalysis has undergone a revolution due to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which have opened up new avenues for improving catalyst design, reaction efficiency, and pathway optimization. Trial-and-error techniques are a major component of traditional catalyst discovery methods, and they can be resource and time-intensive when it comes to real-world applications. On the other hand, real-time reaction condition optimization, predictive modelling, and quicker catalyst screening are made possible by AI-based techniques. Using methods like neural networks, Bayesian optimization, and generative models, this paper emphasizes how artificial intelligence has been revolutionizing catalyst creation along with mechanistic knowledge and process intensification. AI has the ability to completely transform catalytic research, as demonstrated by a number of case studies that demonstrate its use in CO₂ hydrogenation, biomass upgrading, and metal catalyzed reactions.
methodsThis review synthesizes recent developments in AI-enhanced catalytic modelling, kinetic parameter estimation, and multi-scale reaction simulations and explores machine learning models such as Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Artificial Neural Networks, and Gaussian Processes to predict key catalytic performance indicators. Additionally, high-throughput simulated screening and computational methods such as Density Functional Theory simulations and molecular descriptor-based modelling have been used to improve catalyst design tactics. Summary of the ML models which were trained and validated using open source frameworks such as scikit-learn, TensorFlow, and PyTorch is also presented in this paper. Most of the research studies datasets were using the resource data from Catalysis Hub and the materials project. Techniques for data processing and pre-processing include methods for choosing the component features, such as d-band center analysis, adsorption energy calculations, and algorithm normalization. This review study consists of an in-depth analysis of how data-driven modelling improves catalyst performance, and its prediction and optimization in hydrogenation catalysis reactions by artificial intelligence and machine learning driven approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40304789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.