ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Preoperative Analgesia in Midurethral Sling: A Cohort Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced recovery after breast surgery: a review of international evidence and nursing challenges in China.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition among adult women in the USA, with its prevalence expected to rise owing to an aging population. Midurethral sling (MUS) procedures are a well-established surgical treatment for SUI. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols advocate for multimodal pain management strategies, including preoperative analgesia. However, limited data exist on the effectiveness of preoperative pain medications in MUS procedures. This study examines the impact of preoperative analgesia on postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption.
methodsA retrospective cohort study analyzed women who underwent MUS placement between 2018 and 2022 within a New England health care system. Patients were stratified by preoperative pain medication use. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes assessed anesthesia type, sling type, and operative time. Multivariable regression analyses adjusted for confounders.
resultsA total of 631 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 400 receiving preoperative pain medications. Patients with preoperative analgesia had significantly lower median postoperative pain scores (p = 0.013) and were more likely to achieve acceptable pain control (p = 0.014). However, adjusted analyses found no significant difference in opioid consumption or pain scores between groups.
conclusionPreoperative pain medications were associated with improved pain scores in unadjusted analyses but did not demonstrate independent statistical significance after adjusting for confounders. These findings highlight the complexity of pain management in MUS procedures. Further randomized studies are needed to refine ERAS pain strategies in urogynecological surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40304784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.