Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304775›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2025

A unifying model for multiple sclerosis.

Daniel Jonathan Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel Jonathan ParkMelbourne Bioinformatics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. djp@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder with unresolved cause that has been the subject of intensive research. A variety of putative models have been proposed to explain the course of disease. The preeminent mechanisms are suggested to be based on autoimmunity, including via viral epitope mimicry, although difficulties with a classical autoimmunity model for MS have been described. One prior idea that incorporates consideration of viral-self-cross-reactivity is that reactivated HHV-6A virus might induce subsequent reactivation of another virus, EBV, in a relay, resulting in a cascade of downstream consequences. Here, an alternative model for MS is proposed. This posits a viral reactivation relay in which EBV reactivation in the brain precedes HHV-6A reactivation in oligodendrocytes and neurons. At this juncture, relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) can ensue to generate characteristic lesions, dominated by outbreaks of viral reactivation and CD8+T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity and inflammation. Additionally, self-targeting antibodies can be raised to mark the onset of progressive MS in a subset of patients. This model harmonises a plethora of prior evidence from diverse fields. It is suggested that future studies should challenge this new model for MS and that it provides direction for future approaches to prevention and therapy.

Indexed as

Herpesvirus 6, HumanMultiple SclerosisAutoimmunityEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansVirus ActivationAutoantibodiesCytotoxicityDisease modelEBVHHV-6AMultiple sclerosisProgressive MSRRMSViral reactivation

Identifiers

PMID40304775
PMCPMC12043774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.