ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2025
[How age-friendly are cities and communities? German version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ)].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neighbourhood-level age-friendliness in urban environments: associations with functional independence and physical activity in older adults after a fall.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ-Arabic).Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveUrbanisation and demographic change present social challenges that are often insufficiently addressed in urban and care planning. This study introduces a German-language version of the Age-Friendly Cities and Communities Questionnaire (AFCCQ) as a tool for measuring age-friendliness. The aim is to assess age-friendliness from the perspective of older adults and to identify varying needs within cities. In addition, findings for the city of Oldenburg are presented.
methodThe validation study was conducted with a representative sample of older people in Oldenburg (n = 905). The participants completed the AFCCQ-DE questionnaire, consisting of 23 items, and rated their experiences in the city using a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree - strongly agree). A factor analysis and a cluster analysis were then carried out.
resultsThe psychometric validity and reliability of the AFCCQ-DE were confirmed. The questionnaire, which was translated into German for the first time, proved to be a robust instrument that can now be used in German-speaking countries. Using cluster-analytical methods, four groups of older people were identified, differing systematically in terms of their personal characteristics and needs. DISCUSSION: The results highlight the importance of a standardised instrument such as the AFCCQ for planning and evaluating the age-friendliness of cities and municipalities. The collected data provide a basis for the development of targeted urban planning measures that specifically address the needs of older adults and support ageing well in urban environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.