Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304566›Full record

ArticleHepatology communications2025

Global patterns of utilization of noninvasive tests for the clinical management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Alina M Allen, Jeffrey V Lazarus, Naim Alkhouri, Mazen Noureddin, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Emmanuel A Tsochatzis, Leyla de Avila, Andrei Racila, Fatema Nader, Henry E Mark and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Steatotic liver disease in Latin America: current views and perspectives.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alina M AllenThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Jeffrey V LazarusThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Naim AlkhouriThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Mazen NoureddinThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Vincent Wai-Sun WongThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Emmanuel A TsochatzisThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Leyla de AvilaThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Andrei RacilaThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Fatema NaderThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Henry E MarkThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Linda HenryThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Maria StepanovaThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Laurent CasteraThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Zobair M YounossiThe Global NASH Council, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoninvasive tests (NITs) are used to risk-stratify metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. The aim was to survey global patterns of real-world use of NITs.

methodsA 38-item survey was designed by the Global NASH Council. Providers were asked about risks for advanced fibrosis, which NITs (cutoff values) they use to risk-stratify liver disease, monitor progression, and which professional guidelines they follow.

resultsA total of 321 participants from 43 countries completed the survey (54% hepatologists, 28% gastroenterologists, and 18% other). Of the respondents, 85% would risk-stratify patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity (82%), or abnormal liver enzymes (73%). Among NITs to rule out significant or advanced fibrosis, transient elastography (TE) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) were most used, followed by NAFLD Fibrosis Score, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis, and magnetic resonance elastography. The cutoffs for ruling out significant fibrosis varied considerably between practices and from guidelines, with only 50% using TE <8 kPa, 65% using FIB-4 <1.30 for age <65, and 41% using FIB-4 <2.00 for age ≥65. Similar variability was found for ruling in advanced fibrosis, where thresholds of FIB-4 ≥2.67 and TE ≥10 kPa were used by 20% and 17%, respectively. To establish advanced fibrosis, 48% would use 2 NITs while 23% would consider 1 NIT, and 17% would confirm with liver biopsy. TE was used by >75% to monitor, and 66% would monitor (intermediate or high risk) annually. Finally, 65% follow professional guideline recommendations regarding NITs.

conclusionsIn clinical practice, there is variability in NIT use and their thresholds. Additionally, there is suboptimal adherence to professional societies' guidelines.

Indexed as

Liver CirrhosisNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePractice Patterns, Physicians'Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk Assessment2D-SWEELFFib-4risk stratificationVCTE

Identifiers

PMID40304566
PMCPMC12045536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.