ArticleHeadache
Swiss Quality of Life and Health Care Impact Assessment in a Real-World Erenumab-Treated Migraine Population: Results over 2 years.
Article in Headache. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The 200 most influential publications in migraine research: a bibliometric mapping of the intellectual landscape.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/
backgroundThis prospective, multicenter, noninterventional cohort study evaluated the impact of erenumab on the quality of life and migraine-related impairment of adult patients with migraine, as well as the drug's tolerability in a real-world setting over 2 years. Erenumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, was licensed in Switzerland for prophylactic treatment of adult patients with migraine in July 2018.
methodsAdult patients with chronic or episodic migraine who received erenumab treatment as per Swiss label were enrolled from 19 sites across Switzerland between February 2019 and November 2022. Inclusion criteria were defined as the following: a migraine diagnosis per International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, patient written informed consent, and adherence to Swiss label guidelines. Exclusion criteria were concomitant use of other investigational drugs or prior treatment with erenumab or any CGRP (receptor)-based therapy. Retrospective and prospective data from patients were collected over 24 months using patient-reported outcome questionnaires (Headache Impact Test-6 [HIT-6], modified Migraine Disability Assessment [mMIDAS], Impact of Migraine on Partners and Adolescent Children [IMPAC]), patient diaries, and medical charts to track migraine days, medication use, and health care utilization. Swiss regulations required patients to maintain migraine diaries 3 months before and during erenumab therapy to record migraine and acute medication days.
resultsA total of 173 patients (84.9% females) were enrolled who had an average age of 44.2 years. Of these, 54.3% were diagnosed with episodic migraine and 45.7% with chronic migraine. At baseline, the participants scored 65.9 ± 4.9 (mean ± SD) on HIT-6. A total of 85.5% had grade III-IV on the mMIDAS and 87% had grade III-IV in IMPAC. Patients reported 16.5 ± 7.2 monthly migraine days and 11.5 ± 7.0 acute migraine-specific medication days per month. After 24 months, the mean HIT-6 score had decreased by 8.1 ± 8.6, mean mMIDAS by 16.6 ± 21.2, monthly migraine days by 8.8 ± 7.6, and mean acute migraine-specific medication days by 5.2 ± 6.8 (all p < 0.001). Reductions of IMPAC by 6.5 ± 6.6 (p < 0.001) showed the beneficial impact of erenumab treatment on the patients' family burden attributed to migraine. Overall, 84 of 173 patients (48.6%) had at least one adverse event and 61 of 173 patients (35.3%) had at least one adverse event related to study drug. The safety profile was in line with the pivotal studies, and no serious adverse events were regarded as being related to erenumab.
conclusionOverall, erenumab treatment significantly reduced the burden of migraine, leading to improved quality of life for patients and their families over a treatment period of 2 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.