Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304531›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025

Increasing inquiry and collaboration: a faculty and undergraduate curricular intern partnership to redesign a cell biology laboratory course.

Louise E O Darling, Sarah Pociask, John W Goss, Julie A Roden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louise E O DarlingDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-8024
Sarah PociaskOffice of Institutional Research, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA.
John W GossDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7999-2900
Julie A RodenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wellesley College, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7488-5073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent trends in undergraduate biology education include incorporating more inquiry/research-focused experiments into laboratory courses as a way to engage students and promote persistence in science. However, many faculty members face constraints in redesigning curricula, including a lack of time for course development. In addition, some undergraduate students find it difficult or intimidating to identify a first independent research position. We describe our experience working with student curricular interns to redesign a cell biology laboratory to be more inquiry-based. Students enrolled in the redesigned course felt that their course research experience was authentic and self-reported improvement in many fundamental scientific skills. Moreover, participating in the redesign project had positive effects on our curricular interns' experiences by exposing them to independent research, pedagogical design, and near-peer teaching. Thus, we believe that developing ways to introduce inquiry-based learning into curricula as a collaborative effort with undergraduate curricular interns has benefits for enrolled students, curricular interns, and faculty. We encourage other undergraduate science faculty to consider this model as they revise their courses.

Indexed as

inquiry-basedlaboratory curricular developmentnear-peer teachingpedagogyundergraduate research experience

Identifiers

PMID40304531
PMCPMC12369356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.