ArticleCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2026
Deciphering the Microbiome-Gut-Eye Axis: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the Causal Influence of Gut Microbiota on Myopia.
Article in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vitamin DBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Precision nutrition targeting the gut microbiota for weight management: mechanisms and applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe intricate relationship between the gut microbiome and myopia is increasingly recognized, underscoring the need to explore its causal dynamics. Despite emerging evidence, the influence of Gut Microbiota (GM) on ocular development remains underexplored.
methodsThis study utilized Mendelian Randomization (MR) to investigate the causal impact of GM on the development of myopia. Instrumental variables (IVs) were identified from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), focusing on genetic variants significantly associated with microbiome composition. A comprehensive array of MR techniques was applied to ensure a robust estimation of causal effects and to adjust for potential confounders and pleiotropy.
resultsThe Inverse-Variance Weighted (IVW) method was used to identify significant associations between GM and myopia. Increased risk of myopia was linked to the class Betaproteobacteria (OR=1.01, 95% CI 1.004-1.017, P=0.003), the order Burkholderiales (OR=1.009, 95% CI 1.001-1.016, P=0.02), the family Oxalobacteraceae (OR=1.005, 95% CI 1.001-1.01, P=0.023), and several genera including Eubacterium xylanophilum group (OR=1.007, 95% CI 1.001-1.013, P=0.033), and Bifidobacterium (OR=1.005, 95% CI 1-1.01, P=0.038). Protective effects were noted for the order Mollicutes RF9 (OR=0.994, 95% CI 0.99-0.999, P=0.014), the genus Allisonella (OR=0.996, 95% CI 0.993-0.999, P=0.019), the genus Lachnospiraceae UCG001 (OR=0.994, 95% CI 0.989-1, P=0.045), and the family Enterobacteraceae (OR=0.991, 95% CI 0.982-1, P=0.047) and order Enterobacteriales (OR=0.991, 95% CI 0.982-1, P=0.047). Sensitivity analyses further confirmed the robustness of these findings. DISCUSSION: This study provides causal evidence for the "Microbiome-Gut-Eye Axis" in myopia development, identifying specific gut microbiota that influence myopia risk. These findings suggest potential for microbiota-targeted interventions, warranting further research in diverse populations.
conclusionsThe findings support the "Microbiome-Gut-Eye Axis" as a potential factor in myopia pathogenesis and highlight microbiota-targeted interventions as novel therapeutic strategies for managing myopia. This study lays the groundwork for further research on how modifying GM can influence eye health and offers new perspectives on preventive health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.