ArticleThe journal of adhesive dentistry2025
Effects of Cleaning Protocols on Resin Bond Strength to Saliva-Contaminated Monolithic Zirconia.
Article in The journal of adhesive dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of saliva contamination and decontamination procedures on bond strength to framework materials.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConsidering the significant weakening of the bonding of resin cements to saliva-contaminated zirconia restorations, this study aimed to investigate the effect of various surface treatment methods on the bonding of self-adhesive resin cement to zirconia after various cleansing methods. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 105 monolithic zirconia specimens were cut from pre-sintered blocks using a water-cooled precision diamond saw. Specimens were kept in the artificial saliva except for the control group. The specimens were then cleaned using one of the following methods: 1. Air-water spray, 2. Isopropyl Alcohol, 3. Pumice, 4. Universal cleaning agent (Ivoclean), 5. Sandblasting, 6. Sandblasting + Ivoclean. Specimens were bonded to self-adhesive resin cement. Specimens were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles after cementation and tested in shear mode (1 mm/min). Images were obtained using a stereomicroscope, scanning electron microscope, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, and multiple comparisons were performed with the Duncan test (α = 0.05).
resultsThe mean shear bond strength values were as follows in descending order: Sandblasting + Ivoclean (9.3 MPa) > sandblasting (8.59 MPa) > Ivoclean (7.21 MPa) > Pumice (4.82 MPa) > Air-water spray (4.15 MPa) > Control (3.65 MPa) > Isopropyl alcohol (3.04 MPa). Significant difference was observed between sandblasting and Ivoclean groups, and between sandblasting and sandblasting + Ivoclean groups (P 0.05). A significant difference was also found between the Ivoclean and sandblasting + Ivoclean groups. The groups treated with sandblasting + Ivoclean, sandblasting, and Ivoclean showed a significant difference compared to all other surface treatment groups. There was no significant difference in shear bond strength among the control, air-water, alcohol, and pumice groups (P > 0.05). Sandblasting, Ivoclean, and Ivo-clean after sandblasting applications were found to deliver significantly higher (P 0.05) adhesion compared with air-water, pumice, and alcohol applications.
conclusionsSubsequent applications of Ivoclean after sandblasting established a stronger bond between self-adhesive resin cement and monolithic zirconia than other cleaning methods tested. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Following airborne particle abrasion, intaglio surfaces of zirconia restorations should best be cleaned using Ivoclean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.