Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
The diagnostic accuracy of different fetal blood sample lactate cutoffs in labor, utilizing the StatStrip Xpress® lactate-meter: A population-based observational study.
Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward implementation of lactate compared with pH in fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: A clinical comparative single-center study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Twenty-year trends in fetal scalp-blood sampling and birth outcomes: A single-center retrospective cohort study of 40 309 women in labor.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Validation and proposal of a clinical intervention cutoff in fetal scalp blood for the point-of care-lactate meter StatStripActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
- The diagnostic accuracy of different fetal blood sample lactate cutoffs in labor, utilizing the StatStrip Xpress® lactate-meter: A population-based observational study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA recent study recommended 5.2 mmol/L as a cutoff for fetal blood sample (FBS) lactate in labor for the StatStrip Lactate®/Lactate Xpress® lactate meter. In the present study, we validated FBS lactate cutoffs in a larger population-based setting, with different CTG guidelines, testing external validity. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a prospective population-based study at Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Norway, a tertiary referral obstetric department with 7000 annual deliveries. Women with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation in gestational week ≥36 + 0 were included in the analyses. We used ROC curves to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and estimate the optimal cutoff for the following adverse neonatal outcomes: Umbilical cord pH ≤7.10, umbilical cord pH ≤7.05, metabolic acidosis (pH <7.0 and Base deficit
resultsOf 7816 included women, 1466 (19%) had a FBS lactate measurement within 25 min prior to delivery. The calculated optimal cutoff for FBS lactate varied by outcomes: 5-min Apgar score <7: AUC 0.69 (0.57-0.80), cutoff 4.0 mmol/L; metabolic acidosis: AUC 0.92 (0.78-1.00), cutoff 7.0 mmol/L; hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: AUC 0.95 (0.86-1.00), cutoff 4.7 mmol/L. Sensitivity increased for some of the outcomes with a decreasing cutoff. Specificity increased for all outcomes with an increasing cutoff.
conclusionsWe consider an FBS lactate cutoff of ≥5.2 mmol/L a good balance between high sensitivity for adverse neonatal outcomes and an acceptable number of needed interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.