Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304201›Full record

ReviewBiology letters2025

New frontiers in dinosaur exploration.

Susannah Maidment, Richard J Butler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dinosaur science.Biology letters · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Susannah MaidmentNatural History Museum, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-2500
Richard J ButlerSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2136-7541

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two hundred years after the naming of the first dinosaur, taxonomic studies remain an important component of dinosaur research. Around 50 new dinosaurs are named each year and are discovered from across the globe. The rate of new dinosaur discovery shows no signs of slowing, but not all geographical areas and temporal windows have been equally investigated. The potential for new dinosaur discoveries in India and Africa seems particularly high, while the Carnian, when dinosaurs probably originated, and the Middle Jurassic, when the major clades diversified, offer the best opportunities to make discoveries that will fundamentally change our understanding of dinosaur evolution. A major challenge to the discovery of new dinosaurs is funding. Frontier fieldwork is sometimes viewed as too risky to fund, while basic taxonomic work is considered to lack impact. As a consequence, we risk an 'extinction of experience', where researchers have limited training in the basic field- and specimen-based research that underpins our discipline. Going forward, new remote sensing techniques may help to find prospective areas, while three-dimensional scanning apps on smartphones will allow us to quickly record field data. Artificial intelligence is likely to be used increasingly for computed tomography segmentation and identification of problematic fossils.

Indexed as

DinosaursFossilsPaleontologyAnimalsBiological Evolutionchallengesfieldworkopportunitiessystematicstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID40304201
PMCPMC12042219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.