ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
Reconstructing illusory camouflage patterns on moth wings using computer vision.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconstructing illusory camouflage patterns on moth wings using computer vision.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monocular depth cues, such as shading, are fundamental for resolving three-dimensional information, such as an object's shape. Animal colour patterns may potentially exploit this mechanism of depth perception, generating false illusions for functions such as camouflage. Reconstructing the potential percept produced by false depth cues is challenging, especially for non-human, animal viewers. Here, we provide a novel step towards solving this problem, taking advantage of state-of-the-art computer vision algorithms typically used for three-dimensional scene reconstruction. We used two approaches for single-image monocular depth estimation: intrinsic image decomposition and deep learning. We first examined how these models performed using images of natural three-dimensional surfaces that moth wing patterns may mimic. We then applied these models to the wing patterns of six species of moth (Lepidoptera) with varying amounts of potential depth information. For one species, we then performed a multi-view reconstruction of the wing pattern to reveal the true (flat) wing shape. Intrinsic image decomposition, which is based on Retinex theory, was sensitive to both real depth cues and high contrast patterns, while the deep-learning models only responded to moths with strong pictorial depth cues. Both approaches reveal how the interpretation of visual cues depends not only on the information available, but also on experience with the natural world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.