Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304187›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Increasing the Effectiveness of Rural, Regional and Remote Food Security Initiatives Through Place-Based Partnerships-A Qualitative Study.

Stephanie L Godrich, Melissa Stoneham, Isabelle Chiera, Jess Doe, Amanda Devine, Emily Humphreys

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie L GodrichSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-8253
Melissa StonehamSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8745-2664
Isabelle ChieraSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8919-885X
Jess DoeSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Amanda DevineNutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6249
Emily HumphreysSystems Change for Good, Adelaide, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

Healthway 34502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedThis work aimed to understand the ways in which local organisations were working in partnership to support food security action in rural, regional, and remote areas.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 101 food security initiative leaders, representing 148 food initiatives within Australia's largest state, Western Australia (WA). A thematic analysis was undertaken using NVivo that indicated a total of 378 partnering organisations worked on the food security initiatives.

resultsOrganisations partnered to address food security in their regions through coordinated action; community consultation; food/financial donations; funding and grants; on-ground programme and service delivery and physical and human resources. Initiatives need to be documented, where appropriate, in formal partnership agreements to increase the sustainability of initiatives yet allow for some adaptability to respond to the changing nature of wicked issues such as food security.

conclusionThis study's findings increase understanding about how rural, regional, and remote Australian organisations are collaborating to drive food security action and identify areas where partnerships could be enhanced to maximise impact on food security. Although this study was undertaken in WA, the recommendations are relevant to all rural, regional, and remote food security initiatives and include helping organisations to identify clear partnership purposes, partner roles, and actions. SO WHAT?: Providing a qualitative analysis of food security partnerships offers insight into the nature, purpose, and experiential phenomena of these partnerships, to determine what, how and why organisations work together.

Indexed as

Food SecurityFood SupplyRural PopulationCooperative BehaviorHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchWestern Australiacollaborationfood securitypartnershipsregional

Identifiers

PMID40304187
PMCPMC12042255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.