ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025
Are We There Yet? Co-Production in Recovery Colleges.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 'Every Voice Matters': A Photovoice Study on the Personal Impacts of Co-Production in Recovery Colleges.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecovery Colleges (RCs) are educational hubs offering a unique approach to enhance mental health and wellbeing by fostering inclusive learning opportunities. Co-production, integrating lived and learned knowledge and experience, is central to RCs. However, in Australia, there is limited understanding of how co-production is defined and implemented. This study explored the definition, interpretation, and practice of co-production in Australian RCs.
methodsSeventeen stakeholders were interviewed to examine their perspectives on co-production in RCs. Using inductive reflexive thematic analysis, we constructed four superordinate and eight subordinate themes exploring co-production's relational and contextual dynamics.
resultsSuperordinate themes were: (1) Conceptual Fluidity and Experiential Integration; (2) Enacting co-production; (3) Navigating power and relationships; (4) Resources for success.
conclusionCo-production practices in Australian RCs are highly complex and variable. Developing consistent definitions, practical guides, and consistent strategies may support a more adaptable and context-sensitive approach for individual RCs. Further research could explore how different RCs manage co-production stages, involve stakeholders over time, and identify metrics to evaluate impact. SO WHAT?: Addressing contextual nuance is critical to strengthen co-production practices. Doing so could enhance the transformative potential of RCs to foster meaningful health and social outcomes and inform other programs applying co-production principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.