Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304072›Full record

SynthesisAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026

Inter-microscope comparability of dental microwear texture data obtained from different optical profilometers: Part II Deriving instrument-specific correction equations for meta-analyses using published data.

Mugino O Kubo, T Kubo, Ellen Schulz-Kornas, T M Kaiser, Daniela E Winkler

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Feeding biomechanics in vertebrates and beyond.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mugino O KuboDepartment of Natural Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7748-7377
T KuboCenter for Data Science, Waseda University, Tokyo, Shinjyuku, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-0399
Ellen Schulz-KornasDepartment of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1657-8256
T M KaiserLeibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (LIB), Department of Vertebrates, Section Mammalogy and Paleoanthropology, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-1751
Daniela E WinklerDepartment of Natural Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-2506

Funding

European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research EMPIR 20IND07 TracOpticJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 20F20325Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H00027Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22K19339Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23H01285
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental microwear texture analysis (DMTA) has emerged as a valuable method for investigating the feeding ecology of vertebrates. Over the past decade, three-dimensional topographic data from microscopic regions of tooth surfaces have been collected, and surface texture parameters have been published for both extant and fossil species. However, different types of measurement instruments and surface processing used by respective laboratories conducting DMTA have limited the potential data comparison. In this study, we propose correction formulae for the DMTA data produced by different instruments to facilitate intercomparison. We used six confocal instruments from five laboratories to scan standard tooth samples with strictly defined scan areas. We found significant differences in DMTA parameter values among the different machines, despite scanning the exact same spots. The degree of discrepancy varied considerably, with instruments from the same manufacturer and similar models showing less variation. Some parameters exhibited high correlations between instruments, enabling the development of regression equations for correction formulae. Using these correction formulae, we adjusted published DMTA data and conducted a meta-analysis of extant herbivores to examine the effects of internal and external abrasives. Our findings indicate overall positive effects of internal and external abrasives on DMTA, with varying responses to the abrasives between ruminant and non-ruminant herbivores. The meta-analysis supports the hypothesis that ruminants effectively "wash ingesta" in their rumens, mitigating the impact of external abrasives and reducing overall dental wear.

Indexed as

ToothTooth WearAnimalsMicroscopy, Confocalconfocal microscopedietsforaging ecologyISO 25178phytolithprofilometertooth wear

Identifiers

PMID40304072
PMCPMC13431707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.