ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Haploidentical, matched-related, and matched-unrelated hematopoietic cell transplant for acute leukemias in the early years of haploidentical transplant implementation in a developing country with a large unrelated donor registry.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Haploidentical Versus HLA-matched Unrelated Donors for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Acute Leukemia: A Multicenter Observational Study in a Developing Country Facilitated by Collaboration Between the CIBMTR and the Brazilian Society of Cellular Therapy and Bone Marrow Transplantation (SBTMO).Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Article
- Alternative versus matched unrelated donor in adolescents and young adults transplanted for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: A report from the SFGM-TC.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Over the last decades, the donor network for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has grown exponentially, including unrelated and haploidentical (Haplo) donors. This study aimed to describe HCT outcomes with MSD, Haplo, and matched unrelated donors (MUD) in an early period of Haplo with posttransplant cyclophosphamide in a developing country with a large unrelated donor registry. Methods: This study was conducted in collaboration with the CIBMTR. We included patients with acute leukemias undergoing HCT between 2014-2018. Results: With 595 patients, 2-year overall survival (OS) was 69% for the MSD, 65% for the Haplo, and 71% for MUD (p=0.24) in CR1, confirmed in multivariable analysis. Relapse rate was lower for MUD (HR=0.35, p=0.0005) than MSD in patients with CR2+, leading to higher OS. Relapse was also higher with Haplo compared with MUD (HR=2.06, p=0.03). Discussion: Only survival bias can explain these findings in CR2+, suggesting some high-risk MUD patients, in which HCT timing is crucial, may not achieve HCT. Alternative donors were associated with higher non-relapse mortality, while PTCy-based Haplo offered the best protection against chronic graft-versus-host disease. Our study suggests Haplo and MUD are acceptable options for patients lacking MSD in developing countries like ours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.