Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303999›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Haploidentical, matched-related, and matched-unrelated hematopoietic cell transplant for acute leukemias in the early years of haploidentical transplant implementation in a developing country with a large unrelated donor registry.

Adriana Seber, Leonardo Javier Arcuri, Vergilio Rensi Colturato, Mair Pedro Souza, Yana Augusta Novis Zogbi, Vaneuza Funke, Decio Lerner, Maria Cristina Macedo, Liane Daudt, Mariana Nassif Kerbauy and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Adriana Seber *Bone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Samaritano, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Javier Arcuri *Bone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Vergilio Rensi ColturatoBone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Amaral Carvalho, Jau, Brazil.
Mair Pedro SouzaBone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Amaral Carvalho, Jau, Brazil.
Yana Augusta Novis ZogbiOncohematology Department, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Vaneuza FunkeBone Marrow Transplant Department, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Decio LernerBone Marrow Transplant Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Cristina MacedoBone Marrow Transplant Team, Bio Sana's Servicos Medicos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Liane DaudtBone Marrow Transplant Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Mariana Nassif KerbauyBone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Victor Gottardello ZecchinPediatric Bone Marrow Transplant, Beneficiencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Barroso DuarteHematology, Oncology, and Bone Marrow Transplant Department, Universidade Federal do Ceara, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Ricardo Rabello ChiattoneBone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Samaritano, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Rodolfo Daniel de Almeida SoaresBone Marrow Transplant Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Gustavo BettarelloBone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital DF Star Rede D'or, Brasilia, Brazil.
Antonio Vaz de MacedoHematology Department, Hospital da Policia Militar de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Eduardo PatonBone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy Unit, Cancer Center Oncoclinicas, Nova Lima, Brazil.
Tatiana Dias Marconi MonteiroBone Marrow Transplant Unit, Centro de Hematologia de Hemoterapia de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
Jayr Schmidt FilhoHematology, Bone Marrow Transplant, and Cellular Therapy Department, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia Caceres AstigarragaBone Marrow Transplant Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Phillip ScheinbergHematology and Oncology Department, Beneficiencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Afonso Celso VigoritoHematology, Hemotherapy, and Bone Marrow Transplant Center, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Carmen Silvia Vieitas VergueiroAssociacao de Medula Ossea do Estado de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Anderson SimioneBone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Amaral Carvalho, Jau, Brazil.
Shahrukh HashmiCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Wael SaberCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Jinalben PatelCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Carmem Maria Sales BonfimDuke University, Transplant and Cellular Therapy Department, Durham, NC, United States.
Marcelo PasquiniCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Mary Evelyn FlowersFred Hutch Cancer Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, WA, United States.
Nelson HamerschlakBone Marrow Transplant Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Over the last decades, the donor network for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has grown exponentially, including unrelated and haploidentical (Haplo) donors. This study aimed to describe HCT outcomes with MSD, Haplo, and matched unrelated donors (MUD) in an early period of Haplo with posttransplant cyclophosphamide in a developing country with a large unrelated donor registry. Methods: This study was conducted in collaboration with the CIBMTR. We included patients with acute leukemias undergoing HCT between 2014-2018. Results: With 595 patients, 2-year overall survival (OS) was 69% for the MSD, 65% for the Haplo, and 71% for MUD (p=0.24) in CR1, confirmed in multivariable analysis. Relapse rate was lower for MUD (HR=0.35, p=0.0005) than MSD in patients with CR2+, leading to higher OS. Relapse was also higher with Haplo compared with MUD (HR=2.06, p=0.03). Discussion: Only survival bias can explain these findings in CR2+, suggesting some high-risk MUD patients, in which HCT timing is crucial, may not achieve HCT. Alternative donors were associated with higher non-relapse mortality, while PTCy-based Haplo offered the best protection against chronic graft-versus-host disease. Our study suggests Haplo and MUD are acceptable options for patients lacking MSD in developing countries like ours.

Indexed as

acute lymphoblastic leukemiahaploidentical transplantationhematopoietic cell transplantationmatched-related donorsposttransplant cyclophosphamidesurvival biasunrelated donors

Identifiers

PMID40303999
PMCPMC12037578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.