ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
Individually designed ablation of low-voltage areas in persistent atrial fibrillation-a randomized controlled trial (IDEAL-AF): study design and rationale.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04377594 (Individually DEsigned Ablation of Low Voltage Areas in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Individually DEsigned Ablation of Low Voltage Areas in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atrial fibrillation substrate mapping with emphasis on voltage-based guidance.World journal of cardiology · 2025Review
- A Novel Clinical Score Integrating Low-Voltage Zones and Biomarkers Predicts Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Post-Ablation.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- Pulsed field ablation in persistent left superior vena cava for atrial fibrillation via interrupted inferior vena cava with azygos continuation utilizing novel electroanatomic mapping features in the presence of a permanent pacemaker.HeartRhythm case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Voltage-based ablation is a promising catheter ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) in which low-voltage zones (LVZs) are targeted as a complement to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In a randomized setting, we intend to investigate whether PVI plus ablation of LVZs, compared to PVI-only, decreases the incidence of arrhythmia recurrence and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with persistent AF and LVZs. Methods and results: Individually designed ablation of low-voltage areas in persistent atrial fibrillation trial (IDEAL-AF; NCT04377594) is a multi-centre, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients with persistent AF and LVZs ≥ 3.0 cm² outside the PVI ablation lines will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI or PVI plus LVZ ablation. The primary outcome will be the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias off anti-arrhythmic drugs during 12 months of follow-up after one to two ablation procedures within 6 months. A 3-month blanking period will be applied after the first procedure. Patients will be monitored using a smart phone-based ECG recording device throughout the follow-up period. With an anticipated enrolment of 936 patients, this study has 80% power to detect a 20% absolute risk reduction in the primary endpoint. Additionally, HRQoL improvement will be assessed using three questionnaires. Conclusion: IDEAL-AF is a multi-centre, randomized, controlled clinical trial investigating whether ablation of LVZs in addition to PVI reduces the recurrence rate of atrial arrhythmias and improves HRQoL compared to PVI-only in patients with persistent AF and LVZs. This study has the potential to modify recommendations regarding ablation techniques for this specific patient cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.