ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Investigating possible shared single nucleotide polymorphisms in isolated oral cleft and non-cleft facial morphology.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the association between genetic polymorphisms in FGFR2 and children's facial morphology.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Facial morphogenesis is regulated by several cellular interactions that are mediated by numerous morphogenetic signals. Based on the existing evidence, we hypothesize that oral cleft-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are involved in the normal range of human face development. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between SNPs in oral cleft-related genes and variations in the normal range of facial morphology. Method: A sample of healthy Brazilian teenagers (aged between 11 and 18 years old) were screened and collected. Frontal facial digitized photographs from orthodontic records were used to determine phenotypes, while the DNA extracted from saliva samples was used to investigate the candidate SNPs. Five oral cleft-associated SNPs in Results: A total of 58 individuals (27 boys and 31 girls) were included. The facial landmarks used for the facial measurements were the trichion (Tr), glabella (G), nassion (N), subnasale (Sn), labrale superior (Ls), labrale inferior (Li), gnathion (Gn), cheilon (Ch), and zygoma (Zg). Conclusion: Our study supported the hypothesis that oral cleft-associated SNPs are involved in the normal range of human facial morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.