ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Comparison of traditional template measurements and artificial intelligence preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 3D imaging-based AI models outperform demographic models and excel in tibial sizing compared with 2D models in total knee arthroplasty planning: A systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- CT-based 3D planning-supported stem-free screw-cement augmentation versus 2D radiograph-planned short-stem reconstruction for AORI type I-II medial tibial defects in TKA: a two-year retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The poor reliability of preoperative planning measured by traditional x-ray templates increases the difficulty of osteotomy and prosthesis implantation during an operation, which to some extent affects the surgical outcome of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative satisfaction of patients. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We prospectively selected 48 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis in our Joint Surgery Department between March 2021 and May 2022. The test group included 24 patients who underwent three-dimensional preoperative planning using artificial intelligence (AI), and the control group consisted of 24 patients who underwent two-dimensional preoperative planning using traditional template measurement. The differences were not statistically significant when comparing the general information of the two groups, such as gender, age, BMI, affected side category, ASA classification, history of diabetes, history of stroke ( Results: All patients were followed for 6-8 months, and no postoperative complications or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. There was no statistically significant difference between the general data of patients in both groups ( Conclusion: Compared with traditional film planning, AI preoperative planning can improve the accuracy of intraoperative prosthesis implantation and the surgical outcome of TKA, which is worthy of further promotion and application in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.