Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303904›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Construction of edit-distance graphs for large sets of short reads through minimizer-bucketing.

Pengyao Ping, Jinyan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pengyao PingSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-3273
Jinyan LiSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-7413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Pairs of short reads with small edit distances, along with their unique molecular identifier tags, have been exploited to correct sequencing errors in both reads and tags. However, brute-force identification of these pairs is impractical for large datasets containing ten million or more reads due to its quadratic complexity. Minimizer-bucketing and locality-sensitive hashing have been used to partition read sets into buckets of similar reads, allowing edit-distance calculations only within each bucket. However, challenges like minimizing missing pairs, optimizing bucketing parameters, and exploring combination bucketing to improve pair detection remain. Results: We define an edit-distance graph for a set of short reads, where nodes represent reads, and edges connect reads with small edit distances, and present a heuristic method, reads2graph, for high completeness of edge detection. Reads2graph uses three techniques: minimizer-bucketing, an improved Order-Min-Hash technique to divide large bins, and a novel graph neighbourhood multi-hop traversal within large bins to detect more edges. We then establish optimal bucketing settings to maximize ground truth edge coverage per bin. Extensive testing demonstrates that read2graph can achieve 97%-100% completeness in most cases, outperforming brute-force identification in speed while providing a superior speed-completeness balance compared to using a single bucketing method like Miniception or Order-Min-Hash. Availability and implementation: reads2graph is publicly available at https://github.com/JappyPing/reads2graph.

Identifiers

PMID40303904
PMCPMC12040381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.