Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303887›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

A Phase 4, multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, observational study to investigate the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of perampanel when used as first adjunctive therapy in routine clinical practice in people with epilepsy: Study 512.

Sergey Burd, Giovanni Assenza, Sofia Quintas, Francisco José Gil López, Jan Wagner, Anna Lebedeva, Pavel Vlasov, Nina Pantina, Anna Patten, Samantha Goldman and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sergey Burd *Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Giovanni Assenza *UOC Neurologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Sofia Quintas *Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
Francisco José Gil López *Hospital Universitari del Sagrat Cor, Barcelona, Spain.
Jan Wagner *University of Ulm and Universitäts-und RehabilitationsklinikenUlm, Ulm, Germany.
Anna Lebedeva *Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Pavel Vlasov *Department of Neurology, Scientific Research Institute of Clinical Medicine named after N.A. Semashko, Russian University of Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Nina Pantina *Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies, Moscow, Russia.
Anna Patten *Eisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Samantha Goldman *Eisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Ricardo Sáinz-Fuertes *Eisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Marta Torres Arlandis *Eisai Europe Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
Stanislas Lagarde *APHM, Timone Hospital, Epileptology and Cerebral Rhythmology, Marseille, France.
Tobias Sejbaek *Hospital Southwest Jutland, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Vadim Kharkovsky *Department of Neurology, Scientific Research Institute of Clinical Medicine named after N.A. Semashko, Russian University of Medicine, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Study 512 aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of perampanel (PER) as the first add-on therapy. Methods: In this 12-month, prospective, observational, multicenter study, people with epilepsy (PWE) aged ≥12 years with focal-onset seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) associated with idiopathic generalized epilepsy received PER as the first add-on therapy to antiseizure medication (ASM) monotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the retention rate at 12 months. Other endpoints included change in seizure frequency from baseline; pragmatic seizure freedom rate (proportion of PWE in the full analysis set achieving freedom from all seizures); responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline), changes from baseline in the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy questionnaire (QOLIE-10) total score, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the age-corrected EpiTrack and EpiTrack Junior total score; safety/tolerability (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]); and PER dose. Results: Of 184 PWE (Safety Set, Conclusion: PER was efficacious for focal and generalized seizures across all age groups and was generally well-tolerated, as demonstrated by the high retention rates at 12 months.

Indexed as

epilepsyfirst add-onfocal epilepsygeneralized epilepsyperampanelreal-world

Identifiers

PMID40303887
PMCPMC12039034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.