Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303864›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Estimation of the water content of needles under stress by

Jiaze Guo, Xiaojun Huang, Debao Zhou, Junsheng Zhang, Gang Bao, Siqin Tong, Yuhai Bao, Dashzebeg Ganbat, Dorjsuren Altanchimeg, Davaadorj Enkhnasan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiaze Guo *College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Xiaojun Huang *College of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Debao ZhouForest Biological Disaster Prevention and Control Station, Yakeshi, Inner Mongolia, China.
Junsheng ZhangForest Biological Disaster Prevention and Control Station, Yakeshi, Inner Mongolia, China.
Gang BaoCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Siqin TongCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Yuhai BaoCollege of Geographical Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, China.
Dashzebeg GanbatInstitute of Geography and Geoecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Dorjsuren AltanchimegInstitute of Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Davaadorj EnkhnasanInstitute of Biology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Mungunkhuyag AriunaaInstitute of Geography and Geoecology, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: In this work, we combine vegetation indices with machine learning algorithms to estimate the water content of needles at a large scale. Multiple vegetation indices are screened via recursive feature elimination cross validation (RFECV), and then support vector regression (SVR) and back-propagation neural network (BP) models are used to predict the leaf weight content fresh (LWCF) and leaf weight content dry (LWCD) of needles over a large area. The water content ranges were then classified based on the severity of damage derived from actual sampling data. These ranges were used to categorize the estimated water content, thereby assessing the degree of tree damage. The accuracy of the method is verified by comparing the estimation results with field measurements, and the results are combined with the classifications of the leaf loss rate(LLR) to assess the severity of infestation. Results: The results indicate that: 1) When estimating LWCD and LWCF using the SVR and BP models, the SVR model demonstrated superior accuracy and stability (MAE for LWCF = 0.1477, RMSE = 0.17314; MAE for LWCD = 0.10507, RMSE = 0.14760). 2) The classification accuracies of LWCD and LWCF were notably higher in areas with light and medium damage, suggesting that these indices are effective indicators for assessing damage caused by

Indexed as

Erannis jacobsoni Djak.leaf weight content dryleaf weight content freshremote sensevegetation index

Identifiers

PMID40303864
PMCPMC12038450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.