Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303839›Full record

ArticlemicroPublication biology2025

Investigating the Effects of

Clement Bagaza, Huda Ansaf, Abou Yobi, Ruthie Angelovici

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in microPublication biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Clement Bagaza *Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Huda Ansaf *Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Abou YobiDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States.
Ruthie AngeloviciDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As plant seeds mature, they accumulate large quantities of seed storage proteins, which are a vital source of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur necessary for establishing the seedling, especially during the transition from the heterotrophic to the photoautotrophic stage. However, seed storage proteins in many crop seeds are deficient in essential amino acids, which cannot be synthesized by humans and monogastric animals and must be obtained from the diet. Lysine and tryptophan are the most deficient amino acids in cereal seeds, while methionine is the most deficient amino acid in legumes. In the last few decades, extensive research has been done to improve the nutritional quality of seed crops. However, much of this effort was hindered due to the conserved natural phenomenon of proteomic rebalancing that 'resets' the seed's protein-bound amino acid composition despite major alterations to the proteomic sink. Neither the underlying regulatory mechanism nor the natural function of proteomic rebalancing is well understood. To address this gap, we used the model organism

Identifiers

PMID40303839
PMCPMC12038438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.