Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303836›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Artificial intelligence applications in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder: A systematic review.

Umile Giuseppe Longo, Martina Marino, Guido Nicodemi, Matteo Giuseppe Pisani, Jacob F Oeding, Christophe Ley, Rocco Papalia, Kristian Samuelsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Umile Giuseppe LongoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4063-9821
Martina MarinoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-9952-0986
Guido NicodemiFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Matteo Giuseppe PisaniFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.
Jacob F OedingDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-4373
Christophe LeyDepartment of Mathematics University of Luxembourg Esch-sur-Alzette Luxembourg.
Rocco PapaliaFondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Roma Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6069-4871
Kristian SamuelssonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5383-3370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present review is to evaluate and report on the available literature discussing artificial intelligence (AI) applications to the diagnosis of shoulder conditions, outcome prediction of shoulder interventions, and the possible application of such algorithms directly to surgical procedures. Methods: In February 2024, a search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases was performed. Studies had to evaluate AI model effectiveness for inclusion. Research on healthcare cost predictions, deterministic algorithms, patient satisfaction, protocol studies and upper-extremity fractures not involving the shoulder were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools were used to assess bias. Results: Thirty-three studies were included in the analysis. Seven studies analysed the detection of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) in magnetic resonance imaging and found area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.812 to 0.94 for the detection of RCTs. One study reported Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics values ranging from 0.79 to 0.97 for the prediction of clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. In terms of outcomes of rotator cuff repair, an AUC value ranging from 0.58 to 0.68 was reported for prediction of patient-reported outcome measures, and an AUC range of 0.87-0.92 was found for prediction of retear rate. Five studies evaluated the identification of shoulder implant models following TSA from radiographs, with reported accuracy ranging from 89.90% to 97.20%. Conclusion: AI application enables forecasting of clinical outcomes, permits refined diagnostic evaluation and increases surgical accuracy. While promising, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice requires careful consideration. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

artificial Intelligencemachine learningorthopaedic surgeryshoulder disorders

Identifiers

PMID40303836
PMCPMC12038175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.