Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303798›Full record

ReviewTransboundary and emerging diseases2023

Trends in Bacterial Pathogens of Bats: Global Distribution and Knowledge Gaps.

Tamara Szentivanyi, Clifton McKee, Gareth Jones, Jeffrey T Foster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A systematic review and meta-analysis ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Relapsing feverbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Host-Driven Genetic Diversity ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamara SzentivanyiPathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8123-0374
Clifton McKeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6149-0598
Gareth JonesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1904-3735
Jeffrey T FosterPathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8235-8564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats have received considerable recent attention for infectious disease research because of their potential to host and transmit viruses, including Ebola, Hendra, Nipah, and multiple coronaviruses. These pathogens are occasionally transmitted from bats to wildlife, livestock, and to humans, directly or through other bridging (intermediate) hosts. Due to their public health relevance, zoonotic viruses are a primary focus of research attention. In contrast, other emerging pathogens of bats, such as bacteria, are vastly understudied despite their ubiquity and diversity. Here, we describe the currently known host ranges and geographic distributional patterns of potentially zoonotic bacterial genera in bats, using published presence-absence data of pathogen occurrence. We identify apparent gaps in our understanding of the distribution of these pathogens on a global scale. The most frequently detected bacterial genera in bats are

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsBacterial ZoonosesChiropteraAnimalsGlobal HealthZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID40303798
PMCPMC12017137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.