Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303756›Full record

SynthesisTransboundary and emerging diseases2023

Accuracy of Tests for Diagnosis of Animal Tuberculosis: Moving Away from the Golden Calf (and towards Bayesian Models).

Alberto Gomez-Buendia, Pilar Pozo, Catalina Picasso-Risso, Adam Branscum, Andres Perez, Julio Alvarez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring specific biomarkers in blood forFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto Gomez-BuendiaVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8968-0836
Pilar PozoVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2003-2873
Catalina Picasso-RissoVeterinary Population Medicine Department, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-9592
Adam BranscumBiostatistics Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Andres PerezVeterinary Population Medicine Department, University of Minnesota, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Julio AlvarezVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-9417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decades have seen major efforts to develop new and improved tools to maximize our ability to detect tuberculosis-infected animals and advance towards the objective of disease control and ultimately eradication. Nevertheless, there is still uncertainty regarding test performance due to the wide range of specificity and especially sensitivity estimates published in the scientific literature. Here, we performed a systematic review of the literature on studies that evaluated the performance of tuberculosis diagnostic tests used in animals through Bayesian Latent Class Models (BLCMs), which do not require the application of a (fallible) reference procedure to classify animals as infected with tuberculosis or not. BLCM-based sensitivity and specificity estimates deviated from those obtained using a reference procedure for certain antemortem tests: an overall lower sensitivity of skin tests and serology and a higher sensitivity of interferon-gamma (IFN-

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineTuberculosis, BovineAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID40303756
PMCPMC12017179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.