Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303739›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2023

A Longitudinal Study of NADC34-Like Strains in an Intensive Farm Unravels Divergent Evolution.

Sijia Xu, Jing Liu, Jiabao Xing, Han Gao, Dihua Zhu, Zhiying Xu, Jianhao Zhong, Yue Li, Xiaopeng Gao, Qiyuan Kuang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sijia XuKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4286-0668
Jing LiuKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiabao XingKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Han GaoKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Dihua ZhuKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiying XuKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianhao ZhongKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue LiKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaopeng GaoKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiyuan KuangKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Guihong ZhangKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Heng WangKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8471-6337
Yankuo SunKey Laboratory of Zoonosis Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4647-6204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NADC34-like porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRSV) has had a significant impact on the pig industry, particularly in China. However, the evolutionary characteristics and pathogenicity of NADC34-like PRRSV strains within intensive farming systems are not well understood, particularly regarding the biological characteristic variation of successive outbreaks on a farm. In this study, we conducted continuous surveillance in an intensive farm that experienced a PRRSV outbreak. Two PRRSV strains, GDHZ109/2020 and GDYS162/2022, were isolated and fully sequenced from the same swine farm in Guangdong Province in 2020 and 2022, respectively. Evolutionary analysis based on the ORF5 gene revealed that both strains clustered with NADC34-like strains and shared 96.5% homology. Analysis of the full-length genome and NSP2 gene classified the strains into lineage 1.8, represented by the NADC30 strain. Recombination analysis suggested complex recombination patterns for both strains, involving NADC30-like, NADC34-like, and JXA1-like strains. Although many recombinant regions were nearly identical, there were differences observed in the NSP5-NSP7 region. Pathogenicity experiments conducted on piglets demonstrated that GDHZ109/2020 exhibited higher pathogenicity compared to GDYS162/2022. Piglets in the GDHZ109/2020 infected group had more severe clinical signs and higher mortality. Moreover, analysis of respiratory microbial diversity indicated a significant increase in the abundance of potentially pathogenic microbiota, such as

Indexed as

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusAnimalsChinaDisease OutbreaksEvolution, MolecularFarmsLongitudinal StudiesPhylogenySwine

Identifiers

PMID40303739
PMCPMC12016764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.