Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303687›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2023

Farm Prevalence of Bovine Brucellosis, Farmer Awareness, and Local Practices in Small- and Medium-Scale Cattle Farms in a Tropical Region of Ecuador.

R L Vinueza, B Durand, F Ortega, F Salas, A Ferreira Vicente, L Freddi, C Ponsart, G Zanella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring bovine brucellosis in Bangladesh: Current scenario and future outlook.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024
    Review
  3. A first insight into seropositivity and risk factors forOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R L VinuezaUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Laboratory for Animal Health, Epidemiology Unit, Maisons-Alfort 94700, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4587-8795
B DurandUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Laboratory for Animal Health, Epidemiology Unit, Maisons-Alfort 94700, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-1394
F OrtegaUniversidad San Francisco de Quito, Escuela de Salud Pública, Cumbayá, Quito 150157, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8618-2057
F SalasUniversidad San Francisco de Quito, Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Cumbayá, Quito 150157, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2882-4384
A Ferreira VicenteUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Laboratory for Animal Health, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, National and OIE (WOAH) Animal Brucellosis Reference Laboratory, Maisons-Alfort 94700, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3960-6646
L FreddiUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Laboratory for Animal Health, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, National and OIE (WOAH) Animal Brucellosis Reference Laboratory, Maisons-Alfort 94700, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-4113
C PonsartUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Laboratory for Animal Health, Bacterial Zoonoses Unit, National and OIE (WOAH) Animal Brucellosis Reference Laboratory, Maisons-Alfort 94700, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9633-4464
G ZanellaUniversity Paris-Est, Anses, Laboratory for Animal Health, Epidemiology Unit, Maisons-Alfort 94700, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-5784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted on bovine brucellosis in a sample of 173 medium/small-scale cattle farmers in a tropical region of Ecuador. A total of 173 milk tank samples were collected and analyzed through an indirect ELISA. A survey was also applied to each farm to collect information on herd management, evaluate the level of knowledge about the disease and estimate the risk that bovine brucellosis on those farms could represent for public health. The apparent prevalence among farms was 11.5% (95% CI: 6.7%-16.2%). The medium farms had a prevalence significantly higher (23.8%, 95% CI: 10.9%-36.6%,

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBrucellosis, BovineFarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAnimalsCattleCross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorFarmsFemaleHumansMilkPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40303687
PMCPMC12016698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.