Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303664›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2023

A Combined Method Based on the FIPV N Monoclonal Antibody Immunofluorescence Assay and RT-nPCR Method for the Rapid Diagnosis of FIP-Suspected Ascites.

Liang Xu, Shaotang Ye, Yulin Ding, Yuqing Xiao, Congwen Yao, Zhen Wang, Siqi Cai, Jiajun Ou, Jianwei Mao, Xuerui Hu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Liang XuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Shaotang YeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yulin DingCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Technologyin Animal Disease, Ministry of Agriculture, Hohhot 010018, China.
Yuqing XiaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Congwen YaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhen WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Siqi CaiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajun OuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianwei MaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuerui HuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Song ChengLaboklin Laboratory for Clinical Diagnostics, Guang Zhou 510700, China.
Jingyu WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Gang LuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1870-4490
Shoujun LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9560-2826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP), which is caused by feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV), is a fatal and immunologically mediated infectious disease among cats. At present, due to the atypical clinical symptoms and clinicopathological changes, the clinical diagnosis of FIP is still difficult. The gold standard method for the differential diagnosis of FIP is immunohistochemistry (IHC) which is time-consuming and requires specialized personnel and equipment. Therefore, a rapid and accurate clinical diagnostic method for FIPV infection is still urgently needed. In this study, based on the etiological investigation of FIPV in parts of southern China, we attempted to explore a new rapid and highly sensitive method for clinical diagnosis. The results of the etiological investigation showed that the N gene of the FIPV BS8 strain had the highest homology with other strains. Based on this, a specific FIPV BS8 N protein monoclonal antibody was successfully prepared by expression of the recombinant proteins, immunization of mice, fusion and selection of hybridoma cell lines, and screening and purification of monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, we carried out a time-saving combination method including indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and nested reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-nPCR) to examine FIP-suspected clinical samples. These results were 100% consistent with IHC. The results revealed that the combined method could be a rapid and accurate application in the diagnosis of suspected FIPV infection within 24 hours. In conclusion, the combination of IFA and RT-nPCR was shown to be a fast and reliable method for clinical FIPV diagnosis. This study will provide insight into the exploitation of FIPV N antibodies for the clinical diagnosis of FIP-suspected ascites samples.

Indexed as

AscitesFeline Infectious PeritonitisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralCatsChinaFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectMiceMice, Inbred BALB CSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID40303664
PMCPMC12017028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.