ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
The association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and 1-year outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective large sample cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stress hyperglycemia ratio in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of severity and prognosis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Pooled it
- Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio Predicts 28-Day Mortality in Patients with AMI Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from a Large-Scale Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association between stress hyperglycemia ratio and acute total occlusion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- The role of stress hyperglycemia in in-hospital new-onset atrial fibrillation among patients with acute myocardial infarction: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio (SHR) is associated with poor outcomes in coronary artery disease patients, but its link to Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) prognosis is unclear. This study explores the relationship between SHR and 1-year outcomes after AMI using a large cohort analysis. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 4012 AMI patients from General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University(2016-2019). These patients were stratified into three distinct groups according to the tertiles of the SHR: Group T1 (SHR < 0.90, n=1337), Group T2 (0.90 ≤ SHR < 1.11, n=1337), and Group T3 (SHR ≥ 1.11, n=1338). All patients were clinically followed for 1-years to collect major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). After controlling for different confounding factors, cox regression models and restricted quadratic splines were used to investigate the relationship between SHR and 1-years clinical outcomes. Results: During the 1-year follow-up, 229 all-cause deaths were recorded, yielding a mortality rate of 5.71% (n=229). Additionally, 861 MACCE were recorded, yielding a MACCE rate of 21.46%. After adjusting for covariates, SHR was found to be significantly associated with 1-year MACCE [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.64-2.89; Conclusion: SHR is significantly and positively associated with one-year clinical outcomes in patients with AMI. Furthermore, there is a specific non-linear association between SHR and MACCE and all-cause mortality (both inflection point 0.87). Interventions aimed at reducing SHR levels below 0.87 through medication management have the potential to significantly improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.