ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2025
Comparative Evaluation of Simplified and Modified Histologic Criteria in the Diagnosis of Chronic Autoimmune Hepatitis.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The present study aimed at comparing simplified and modified histologic criteria alone and along with other indicators in the diagnosis of chronic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 48 cases were selected from slides and paraffin blocks of patients suspected of chronic AIH according to clinical and laboratory data, including serology and autoantibody findings and viral hepatitis test results. Then, scores equal to 1 (compatible hepatitis), 2 (typical hepatitis), ≤6 (probable hepatitis), and ≥7 (definite hepatitis) were calculated based on the simplified histologic criteria, modified histologic criteria, and these two criteria, along with other indicators including antinuclear antibodies (Ab), smooth muscle Ab or liver-kidney microsomal Ab or soluble liver antigen (Ag) and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and absence of viral hepatitis. Results: The results of this study revealed that based on the simplified histologic criteria, 43.8% and 56.3% of these cases were assigned a score of 1 and 2 points, respectively. However, calculating the total score using the simplified criteria along with other indicators showed that 60.4% and 39.6% of cases were assigned a score ≤6 and ≥7 points, respectively. Moreover, the modified histologic criteria indicated that 25% and 75% of cases were assigned a score of 1 and 2 points, respectively. Conclusion: According to the findings of the present study, the modified histologic criteria compared to the simplified histologic criteria identified a higher percentage of patients assigned a score of 2 points. Moreover, modified histologic criteria, along with other indicators, were more accurate in detecting definite AIH (score ≥7 points).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.