ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2025
Diabetic Distress among Patients with Type II: A Descriptive Study.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetes is a complicated, long-term condition that necessitates difficult patient self-management. This self-management includes regular medication adherence, daily insulin injections for certain patients, and daily decisions about food, exercise, and blood glucose monitoring. The objective of the study was to evaluate diabetic distress in individuals with type II diabetes. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2024 to May 2024 in a purposive sample of 89 patients attending the outpatient clinic of the Al-Wafia Specialized Center for Diabetes and Endocrinology, a teaching hospital in Mosul. With the help of the literature, a patients' information form containing questions was used to gather data for a questionnaire designed to assess patients' awareness of diabetic distress. The frequencies of the study variables were shown using descriptive statistics. A Chi-square test was used to perform a bivariate analysis. Significant Results: The study outcomes showed that, with a mean of 3.636, 39% of the study sample had moderate or high levels of diabetic distress. There was no correlation found between any demographic factor and diabetic distress, except for the participant age (0.190**). Conclusion: This study concluded that among the enrolled 89 diabetic patients most of them had diabetic distress. The statistical association between overall knowledge and sociodemographic variables indicated that there is no statistically significant difference between patients' knowledge and their sociodemographic information, except with the age group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.