Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303615›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Circulating bacterial DNA in cardiovascular disease.

Sarah Appleby, Rachel Purcell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah ApplebyDepartment of Medicine, Christchurch Heart Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rachel PurcellDepartment of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a global health burden despite advances in prevention and treatment. Conventional biomarkers, while effective for a number of patient groups, fail to provide personalized diagnosis and prognosis, necessitating the exploration of novel markers. Advancements in sequencing technology have unveiled the role of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a reservoir of genetic information from all cells within the body, and associations between elevated cfDNA levels and CVD risk factors and status have been reported. Recent attention has turned to a subset of cfDNA, circulating bacterial DNA (cbDNA), derived from gut microbiota, as a potential biomarker. Investigations into microbial translocation from the gut, particularly the phenomenon of 'leaky gut,' reveal its association with CVD and provide a potential source for cbDNA. Here, we review the existing literature on cbDNA in CVD, highlighting its potential diagnostic and prognostic value. Current studies have largely been carried out in small, disparate cohorts, using different sample types and a range of methodologies. While cbDNA shows potential as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker, the lack of consensus in methodologies and populations studied calls for standardized approaches and large cohorts to establish cbDNA as a reliable CVD biomarker. Future research should focus on identifying the source of cbDNA and its pathological relevance, utilizing advanced sequencing techniques and standardized cohorts for conclusive findings.

Indexed as

biomarkercardiovascular diseasecbDNAcell-free DNAcirculating bacterial DNAliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40303615
PMCPMC12037610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.