Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303593›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025

Do first-time avian migrants know where they are going: the clock-and-compass concept today.

Nikita Chernetsov, Gleb Utvenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikita ChernetsovOrnithology Lab, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Gleb UtvenkoBiological Station Rybachy, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What if your life depended on finding a place you've never been-without a GPS device, a guide, or any way of knowing where to go? For young songbirds, this is the reality of their first migration. While this once puzzled researchers studying bird migration, advances in the field have since uncovered that many songbirds rely on an inherited genetic program to guide their remarkable solo journeys. Today, the most widely accepted theory explaining how young birds of species that migrate solitary and do not follow experienced conspecifics find their way to wintering grounds is the 'clock-and-compass' concept. According to this concept, naïve migrants follow a certain compass direction for a pre-defined period. In the simplest case, when the program runs out, they find themselves in their species-specific non-breeding range. However, recent research suggests that this process might be significantly more complex. New data indicate that first-time migrants may not have a complete map but rather a system of beacons. This system could be based, for example, on geomagnetic cues or other cues that help first-year birds navigate their location along the migration route. To date, a significant body of evidence has been gathered to revise the classic 'clock and compass' program. It is likely that first-time migrants of many species (although perhaps not all) are capable of varying degrees of location control based on innate information. The question of what data sources they use and how precise their control remains open for further investigation.

Indexed as

animal navigation and orientationbird migrationclock-and-compass conceptendogenous programsgenetics of behaviorinnate beaconsinnate component magnetic mapvector navigation

Identifiers

PMID40303593
PMCPMC12037376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.