ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
A multidisciplinary and structured approach for comprehensive evaluation of functional outcomes, adverse events, psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life after local therapy for bone sarcoma in children: protocol for a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multidisciplinary approach to assessing the impact of local therapy in pediatric bone sarcoma patients and survivors: a cross-sectional study of adverse events and health-related quality of life.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Body image of patients in follow-up for pediatric bone sarcoma: implications of tumor location and local therapy.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bone sarcoma patients face intensive treatment, including life-changing local therapy, which impacts both short- and long-term functioning. Moreover, bone sarcoma survivors experience the highest burden of adverse events of all childhood cancer survivors. To address these issues, we set up a structured multidisciplinary outpatient follow-up clinic for patients who completed treatment and integrated this clinic into the standard of care. This study protocol describes the methodology of a cross-sectional study that aims to systematically report the functional outcomes, adverse events, psychosocial outcomes and health-related quality of life of the cohort seen at this clinic. Methods and analysis: Participants are recruited at the multidisciplinary follow-up clinic and their consent is obtained. Standard of care clinical assessments serve as the primary data source for this study. Furthermore, additional research assessments are performed to further expand our knowledge. Assessments are structured by standardized assessment sets that we developed based on literature review and joint national expertise in bone sarcoma care. The sets comply with international guidelines such as the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, disability and health, and include a combination of patient-reported, clinician-reported and performance-based outcome measures for comprehensive representation of outcomes. Discussion: This study will generate valuable knowledge on the functional outcomes, adverse events, psychosocial outcomes and quality of life of a national cohort of pediatric bone sarcoma patients in follow-up care. By aligning additional research assessments with standardized patient care, a comprehensive range of outcomes will be obtained while minimizing the patient's burden. Moreover, this protocol may serve as a template for clinics and research internationally, allowing for the merging of standardized outcome data in such rare disease. This will facilitate the optimization of current patient care and inform the important shared decision-making process for local treatment in future patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.