ArticleCureus2025
The South African Flag Sign: A Key Indicator of Acute D1 Occlusion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The South African flag sign (SAFS) on an ECG suggests an occlusion in the first diagonal branch of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, particularly in the context of acute chest pain. Due to its unique findings, it is often overlooked or misidentified. We present four cases in which this finding was identified on ECG, along with the corresponding angiographic images and clinical details. Two of these had an acute diagonal branch occlusion, which was treated with stent insertion. The other two cases had some angiographic changes but had no stent inserted. All of these cases showed a varying degree of left ventricular dysfunction and troponin rise, highlighting the importance of recognition and prompt management. On subsequent cardiac MRI, one patient was determined to have an aborted infarct, and another was suspected of the same. The urgency with which the SAFS should be expedited to invasive imaging should match that of other acute signs of occlusion, such as the new left bundle branch block (LBBB) in the context of chest pain. Increased awareness of the SAFS can prevent these cases from being overlooked and improve patient outcomes by ensuring they receive timely care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.