ArticleCureus2025
Operation Rate for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly Decreased by 68% After the Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends in Treatment Decisions for Distal Radius Fractures: The Effect of a Guideline Change.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The increasing demand for orthopedic trauma surgery resources highlights the need for an efficient approach to implementing scientifically based interventions and de-implementation of interventions already in use that have been found no better than non-surgical treatments. Several factors have been identified as barriers or facilitators for translating evidence into clinical practice and behavioral changes. To facilitate a structured approach to applying these factors, we have adapted the generic theoretical domains framework (TDF) into the "CEBO model," providing a practical framework for implementing evidence in clinical decision-making in the hospital department of Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark. Aim This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the CEBO model for facilitating surgeon behavior change in an orthopedic surgery department. We will present clinical decision-making regarding the treatment of dorsally displaced distal radius fractures (DDDRF) in the elderly as an example. Methods Our department's standard of care for DDDRF in the elderly was surgical treatment. Under the evolving body of evidence, the CEBO model was applied to facilitate change in treating surgeons' behavior toward the increased use of non-surgical care. Following the four steps of the CEBO model, 1) leadership support was obtained, and relevant evidence was disseminated to all colleagues across the department; 2) stakeholders were invited to a symposium discussing best evidence and future practice; 3) conclusions from the symposium were summarized in a local clinical guideline stating non-surgical treatment as a new department standard and 4) to monitor the changes in treatment, patient charts were retrospectively reviewed from one year before and after the application of the CEBO model. Results In the first period, 95 of 120 (79%) were surgically treated, compared to 16 of 146 (11%) in the second period. An absolute decrease in the operation rate of 68% was observed. Conclusion We found the CEBO model highly feasible for facilitating surgeon behavior change in our orthopedic surgery department. Future studies will investigate the model's feasibility in other institutions and compare it to other behavior-targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.