ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The influence of mood and social relationships on the intensity of basic self-disturbance: an experience sampling method investigation.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Basic Self-disorders Across Psychiatric Diagnoses and Risk Syndromes: An Updated Meta-analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Pooled it
- Mobile Technology for Real-Life Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms as well as Stress Among Individuals With Early Psychosis: A Scoping Review.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Revised Ipseity-Disturbance Model of Schizophrenia and the Nature of Self-Disorder: A Commentary on Raballo et al. (2025).Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Basic self-disturbance (BSD), the overarching concept of various experiences of self-alienation, referred to as anomalous self-experiences (ASEs), is considered a relatively stable clinical marker for the potential development of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. However, research on BSD in children and adolescents in the pre-psychotic phase is limited. Research on individuals at risk for psychosis shows that psychosocial factors are critical in psychosis development, but studies of these factors and the relationship between psychosocial factors and the severity of ASEs are lacking. The present study aims to investigate the extent to which mood, social relationships, and psychosocial factors contribute to the development of BSD in adolescents at risk for psychosis. Methods: We used the experience sampling method to collect real-time data from 27 help-seeking 12- to 19-year-old adolescents. We analyzed data from daily registrations on a smartphone app, measuring the intensity of BSD, mood, and social settings over various time periods (hourly, daily, and weekly over 6 months) by linear mixed regression modeling. Results: Negative emotions were positively associated with the mean ASE scores (β = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.26, 0.34), whereas for the positive emotions, the contrast of the association was significantly negative [β = -0.57, 95% CI = (-0.63, -0.51)]. The effect of being alone at the time of the response on the intensity of ASEs compared to being with others was significantly positive [β = 0.27, 95% CI = (0.08, - 0.46)]. However, this effect was observed only when not being at home, as indicated by the effect of being at home [β = -0.04, 95% CI = (-0.09, 0.11)] compared to not being at home and the interaction between the two social context variables [β = -0.20, 95% CI = (-0.44, -0.04)]. Conclusions: Mood and social settings appear to be influencing factors in the expression and intensity of ASEs. These factors should be addressed in the clinical approach to BSD, and further studies investigating the influence of various psychosocial factors on BSD experiences should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.