Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303423›Full record

ReviewReviews in chemical engineering2025

Machine learning applications for thermochemical and kinetic property prediction.

Lowie Tomme, Yannick Ureel, Maarten R Dobbelaere, István Lengyel, Florence H Vermeire, Christian V Stevens, Kevin M Van Geem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in chemical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Toward a Generalizable Prediction Model of Molten Salt Mixture Density with Chemistry-Informed Transfer Learning.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lowie TommeLaboratory for Chemical Technology, Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 125, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
Yannick UreelLaboratory for Chemical Technology, Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 125, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
Maarten R DobbelaereLaboratory for Chemical Technology, Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 125, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
István LengyelLaboratory for Chemical Technology, Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 125, 9052 Gent, Belgium.
Florence H VermeireDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Christian V StevensSynBioC Research Group, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent 9000, Belgium.
Kevin M Van GeemLaboratory for Chemical Technology, Department of Materials, Textiles and Chemical Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark 125, 9052 Gent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detailed kinetic models play a crucial role in comprehending and enhancing chemical processes. A cornerstone of these models is accurate thermodynamic and kinetic properties, ensuring fundamental insights into the processes they describe. The prediction of these thermochemical and kinetic properties presents an opportunity for machine learning, given the challenges associated with their experimental or quantum chemical determination. This study reviews recent advancements in predicting thermochemical and kinetic properties for gas-phase, liquid-phase, and catalytic processes within kinetic modeling. We assess the state-of-the-art of machine learning in property prediction, focusing on three core aspects: data, representation, and model. Moreover, emphasis is placed on machine learning techniques to efficiently utilize available data, thereby enhancing model performance. Finally, we pinpoint the lack of high-quality data as a key obstacle in applying machine learning to detailed kinetic models. Accordingly, the generation of large new datasets and further development of data-efficient machine learning techniques are identified as pivotal steps in advancing machine learning's role in kinetic modeling.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencekinetic modelingmechanism generationreaction ratethermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID40303423
PMCPMC12037204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.