ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Development of machine learning models to predict clinical outcome and recovery time in dogs with parvovirus enteritis.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and laboratory biomarkers in veterinary medicine: an update about machine learning applications.The veterinary quarterly · 2026Review
- Longitudinal Clinical and Minimally Invasive Readouts Enable Early Assessment of Disease Trajectory in Preclinical Infection Models.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Classification of Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Asian Elephants Using Machine Learning and Survival Analysis: A Retrospective Study (2019-2024).Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canine parvovirus (CPV) is one of the most contagious viral diseases in dogs that usually presents with diarrhea, vomiting, and fever. Various clinical and laboratory biomarkers such as SIRS, leukopenia, neutropenia and CRP have been introduced to predict the final outcome of dogs with CPV. With the advent of machine learning methods/algorithms, various models can be developed using a combination of clinical and non-clinical variables to predict clinical outcome in different diseases with higher efficiency compared to traditional biomarkers. In this study, we sought to develop models to predict clinical outcome and recovery time in dogs with CPV infection using 10 and 4 machine learning algorithms, respectively. A model was developed using four variables (SIRS, deworming, vaccination and crying) to predict clinical outcome. The performance of this model was measured using three metrics: accuracy scores, AUC (area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve) and AUC score. Another model was constructed using five variables (retching, foul smelling, housing, dehydration, and shift-to-left) to estimate recovery time. The performance of this model was evaluated using two criteria: mean square error (MSE) and root mean square error (RMSE). In the model developed for clinical outcome, the average of accuracy scores, AUC scores and AUCs in the test dataset were 0.84, 0.90 and 0.73, respectively. The second model predicted the recovery time in the test group with a mean error of 2 days (RMSE = 2.05). Our findings demonstrate that ML models can effectively integrate clinical and laboratory features to predict survival and recovery time in CPV-infected dogs, offering a valuable tool for early prognosis and treatment optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.