Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40303367›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Automatic pelvic fracture segmentation: a deep learning approach and benchmark dataset.

Yanzhen Liu, Sutuke Yibulayimu, Gang Zhu, Chao Shi, Chendi Liang, Chunpeng Zhao, Xinbao Wu, Yudi Sang, Yu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanzhen LiuBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Sutuke YibulayimuBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Gang ZhuBeijing Rossum Robot Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Chao ShiBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Chendi LiangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Chunpeng ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinbao WuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yudi SangBeijing Rossum Robot Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yu WangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate segmentation of pelvic fractures from computed tomography (CT) is crucial for trauma diagnosis and image-guided reduction surgery. The traditional manual slice-by-slice segmentation by surgeons is time-consuming, experience-dependent, and error-prone. The complex anatomy of the pelvic bone, the diversity of fracture types, and the variability in fracture surface appearances pose significant challenges to automated solutions. Methods: We propose an automatic pelvic fracture segmentation method based on deep learning, which effectively isolates hipbone and sacrum fragments from fractured pelvic CT. The method employs two sequential networks: an anatomical segmentation network for extracting hipbones and sacrum from CT images, followed by a fracture segmentation network that isolates the main and minor fragments within each bone region. We propose a distance-weighted loss to guide the fracture segmentation network's attention on the fracture surface. Additionally, multi-scale deep supervision and smooth transition strategies are incorporated to enhance overall performance. Results: Tested on a curated dataset of 150 CTs, which we have made publicly available, our method achieves an average Dice coefficient of 0.986 and an average symmetric surface distance of 0.234 mm. Discussion: The method outperformed traditional max-flow and a transformer-based method, demonstrating its effectiveness in handling complex fracture.

Indexed as

CT segmentationdeep learningimage-guided surgerypelvic fracturereduction planning

Identifiers

PMID40303367
PMCPMC12039937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.