ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Automatic pelvic fracture segmentation: a deep learning approach and benchmark dataset.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for facial fracture detection: a systematic review.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Anatomy-driven automated subsegmentation of pelvic and proximal femoral CT into clinically relevant subregions and landmarks.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Contemporary Applications of Robotic Systems in Dental Implantology: A Review.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Deep learning and hybrid architectures for atypical and complex bone fracture diagnosis: a systematic review of performance and clinical validity.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate segmentation of pelvic fractures from computed tomography (CT) is crucial for trauma diagnosis and image-guided reduction surgery. The traditional manual slice-by-slice segmentation by surgeons is time-consuming, experience-dependent, and error-prone. The complex anatomy of the pelvic bone, the diversity of fracture types, and the variability in fracture surface appearances pose significant challenges to automated solutions. Methods: We propose an automatic pelvic fracture segmentation method based on deep learning, which effectively isolates hipbone and sacrum fragments from fractured pelvic CT. The method employs two sequential networks: an anatomical segmentation network for extracting hipbones and sacrum from CT images, followed by a fracture segmentation network that isolates the main and minor fragments within each bone region. We propose a distance-weighted loss to guide the fracture segmentation network's attention on the fracture surface. Additionally, multi-scale deep supervision and smooth transition strategies are incorporated to enhance overall performance. Results: Tested on a curated dataset of 150 CTs, which we have made publicly available, our method achieves an average Dice coefficient of 0.986 and an average symmetric surface distance of 0.234 mm. Discussion: The method outperformed traditional max-flow and a transformer-based method, demonstrating its effectiveness in handling complex fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.