ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Use of Novosorb Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix for Reconstruction in Head and Neck Cancer: A Simple Answer to a Complex Problem.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix for Facial Reconstruction Following Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Multi-Subunit Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Skin cancer defects in the head and neck can pose a reconstructive challenge. We aimed to evaluate our experience of Novosorb biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM) in reconstructing complex defects in the head and neck region. Methods: Assessment of all patients where BTM was used for head and neck skin cancer reconstruction was undertaken at our facility. This included tumor type; defect size; second-stage reconstruction (SSR) method; and complications, including failure. Results: Fifty-four patients were identified with 63 lesions reconstructed with BTM. The mean age was 79. Histology was squamous/basosquamous carcinoma in 40 cases (63%), basal cell carcinoma in 15 cases (24%), and melanoma in 3 cases (5%). The anatomical region reconstructed was the scalp in 46 cases (73%) and the nose in 13 cases (21%). Mean maximum defect diameter was 67 mm. In 27 cases (43%), a previous wide local excision demonstrated an involved or close (<1 mm) margin. BTM was applied to burred bone in 24 of these cases (89%). SSR occurred via use of split-thickness skin graft (68%), full-thickness skin graft (14%), or via secondary intention (17%). One (1%) patient died before SSR, unrelated to BTM. SSR was carried out at a mean of 51 days. Five areas of 63 (8%) experienced a failure to fully heal, identified as due to recurrent or residual disease, causing wound breakdown. No significant infections were observed. Conclusions: BTM offers a safe, reliable option for complex head and neck cancer reconstruction, particularly in patients unable to undergo more complex procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.