ArticlePediatric diabetes2023
Disparities in Glycemic Outcomes Persist in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and High-Technology Use.
Article in Pediatric diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From algorithm to alarm: a narrative review on insulin delivery innovation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Automated Insulin Delivery Use Among Preschool-Age Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A T1D Exchange Multicenter Analysis.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Racial disparities are well described in glycemic outcomes in youth with Type 1 diabetes mellites (T1D). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) has some limitations in comparing glycemia across patient groups as there are individual variations in mean glucose and HbA1c. Objective: This study aimed to compare glycemic metrics obtained from (Dexcom G6) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) device with HbA1c levels controlling for race, age, duration of diabetes, race, insurance status, and insulin pump use with glycemic control. Results: Significant differences were observed between NHW and non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients in terms of HbA1c, 90-day mean glucose, and 90-day time >250 mg/dL (>13.9 mmol/L) (7.6% vs. 9.2%, 181 mg/dL vs. 220 mg/dL, and 16.3% vs. 34.7%, respectively, Conclusion: Even in a subset of youth with T1D using CGM with high rates of insulin pump use, disparities in glycemic outcomes persist. When evaluating glycemic outcomes, race remained a significant cofactor despite controlling for age, duration of diabetes, sex, insurance status, and insulin administration type. These results add to the existing literature, and demonstrate race remains strong predictor of glycemic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.